<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on Vazquez, Stadium Grass</title>
	<atom:link href="http://batsboth.com/2009/12/22/thoughts-on-vazquez-stadium-grass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://batsboth.com/2009/12/22/thoughts-on-vazquez-stadium-grass/</link>
	<description>Len Randle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 04:53:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: futures trading</title>
		<link>http://batsboth.com/2009/12/22/thoughts-on-vazquez-stadium-grass/comment-page-1/#comment-39546</link>
		<dc:creator>futures trading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://batsboth.com/?p=114#comment-39546</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Online Article…...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Online Article…&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]The information mentioned in the article are some of the best available [...]&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2010</title>
		<link>http://batsboth.com/2009/12/22/thoughts-on-vazquez-stadium-grass/comment-page-1/#comment-29664</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 07:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://batsboth.com/?p=114#comment-29664</guid>
		<description>of course like your web-site but you need to check the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling issues and I find it very troublesome to inform the reality nevertheless I&#039;ll certainly come back again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course like your web-site but you need to check the spelling on quite a few of your posts. Many of them are rife with spelling issues and I find it very troublesome to inform the reality nevertheless I&#8217;ll certainly come back again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: san angelo Tx</title>
		<link>http://batsboth.com/2009/12/22/thoughts-on-vazquez-stadium-grass/comment-page-1/#comment-13632</link>
		<dc:creator>san angelo Tx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://batsboth.com/?p=114#comment-13632</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Visitor recommendations...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]…...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Visitor recommendations&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]…&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonsel</title>
		<link>http://batsboth.com/2009/12/22/thoughts-on-vazquez-stadium-grass/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>jonsel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://batsboth.com/?p=114#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I understand your feelings about the Yankees&#039; 2009 title. The chief differences between 09 and 96 are the time span between Series wins (and appearances) and the depths to which the team fell in those spans. As anyone who has followed the team for decades, we know well the dreadful lows of the late 80&#039;s early 90s teams. As much as I enjoyed paying $20 for behind-the-plate seats back then, I knew what I was going to see. So when &#039;96 rolled around, it was an exuberant release because we had been as low as we could go and worked our way back. It was also a team that wasn&#039;t necessarily supposed to be title-worthy with a new manager deemed a poor retread.

Jump forward to 2009, and the win wasn&#039;t so much that exuberance (although I was pretty damned happy!) of &#039;96 but relief that we had finally lived up to expectations again. Every year since 2000 the team has been expected to win the Series. There was no drastic falls to last place (despite not making the playoffs last year). Winning is our status quo now. It doesn&#039;t allow for the emotional release of a long-sought after dream.

And as for freeze-dried grass...don&#039;t get it, never will!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand your feelings about the Yankees&#8217; 2009 title. The chief differences between 09 and 96 are the time span between Series wins (and appearances) and the depths to which the team fell in those spans. As anyone who has followed the team for decades, we know well the dreadful lows of the late 80&#8217;s early 90s teams. As much as I enjoyed paying $20 for behind-the-plate seats back then, I knew what I was going to see. So when &#8216;96 rolled around, it was an exuberant release because we had been as low as we could go and worked our way back. It was also a team that wasn&#8217;t necessarily supposed to be title-worthy with a new manager deemed a poor retread.</p>
<p>Jump forward to 2009, and the win wasn&#8217;t so much that exuberance (although I was pretty damned happy!) of &#8216;96 but relief that we had finally lived up to expectations again. Every year since 2000 the team has been expected to win the Series. There was no drastic falls to last place (despite not making the playoffs last year). Winning is our status quo now. It doesn&#8217;t allow for the emotional release of a long-sought after dream.</p>
<p>And as for freeze-dried grass&#8230;don&#8217;t get it, never will!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

